Welcome
Login / Register
advertisements

Business


  • Protect bank transfer scam victims, demands Which?

    People who are tricked into transferring money to a fraudster deserve better protection, according to consumer group Which?.

    It said that anyone falling prey to a bank transfer scam had no legal right to get their money back from a bank.

    The consumer group has made a super-complaint to regulators.

    It wants financial authorities to order banks to offer people the same protection that credit card fraud victims receive.

    "As scams become ever-more sophisticated, consumers can only protect themselves so far," Which? said.

    "People cannot be expected to detect complex scams pressuring them to transfer money immediately or look-alike bills from their solicitor or builder."

    Transfer scams

    The consumer group pointed out that banks have security checks on activities where they are liable to reimburse the victim, for example on credit card fraud.

    It wants similar protection for victims of bank transfer scams.

    Using its legal powers, Which? is making a super-complaint to the Payment Systems Regulator and alerting the Financial Conduct Authority. The regulators have 90 days to investigate and respond.

    It wants the regulators to:

    • Formally investigate the scale of bank transfer fraud and how much it is costing consumers
    • Take action and propose new measures and greater liability for banks to ensure consumers are better protected when they have been tricked into making a bank transfer.

    Alex Neill, director of policy and campaigns at Which? said: "Most of us don't realise is that if you're conned into paying out money to a fraudster you stand to lose all of your money, unlike when you use your credit or debit card.

    "We believe that banks must do more to tackle bank transfer fraud and safeguard their customers from scams."


    Your protection

    If you are tricked into transferring money into a frauster's account, what protection do you have?

    None. Victims conned into transferring money by bank transfer to a scammer currently have no legal right to get their money back from their bank, unlike with many other payment methods.

    If you did not know that, you're not alone.

    Which? research found that six in 10 people had no idea they had no consumer protection from their bank if they were scammed into making a bank transfer.


    'Money had gone'

    In one case highlighted by Which?, fraudsters claiming to be from a UK bank convinced a customer that their account had been compromised and to transfer £17,500 savings to another account, set up in their name.

    Within minutes the customer realised they had been tricked and contacted their bank, only to be told the money had gone and the customer should contact the receiving bank.

    The bank investigated and said the fraudsters had almost cleared the account.

    It only offered to refund the 10p the fraudsters had left behind.

    Super-complaint

    A super-complaint allows certain bodies to complain to regulators about harmful features of a market. Which? is a designated consumer body under the Financial Services (Banking Reform) Act 2013.

    It is the first super-complaint that the Payment Systems Regulator (PSR), which was set up last year, has received.

    It has 90 days to examine the evidence Which? has supplied and gather its own to help decide what action, if any, to take.

    Katy Worobec, Director of Financial Fraud Action UK, a crime prevention group funded by banks and card providers, said it was willing to work with Which? and the regulators but was "disappointed" that the action had been taken by the consumer group.

    "Banks are legally obligated to fulfil a customer's request to transfer money even if they have warned the customer they are at risk of a potential scam. All banks will always work to recover stolen money, and last year recovered 40 per cent of funds taken through remote banking," she said.

    "We are disappointed that Which? did not first seek to find positive solutions to ensure the legal protections for customers work before taking the super-complaint route.

    "Customers rightly expect banks to carry out transactions they have authorised, and banks will provide compensation on a case-by-case basis. However, a blanket approach is equivalent to asking an insurance policy to pay out for theft when the front door was left wide open."

    The PSR has invited anybody with information they believe could be helpful to contact the PSR at PSRSuper-Complaints@psr.org.uk

    Source: BBC

    Read more »
  • Zuckerberg and Chan aim to tackle all disease by 2100

     

    Facebook's founder Mark Zuckerberg and his wife Priscilla Chan have pledged $3bn (£2.3bn) to fund medical research over the next decade.

    At a press conference in San Francisco, they said their ultimate goal was to "cure, prevent or manage all diseases by the end of the century".

    The funds will be distributed by the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, which they created in December 2015.

    Tech leaders are increasingly turning their attention to health.

    Earlier in the week, Microsoft said it intended to "solve" cancer by using artificial intelligence tools.

    Google's DeepMind unit is working with the NHS to find a way to use computers to more accurately diagnose diseases.

    And IBM and MIT announced a tie-up earlier this week to develop AI-based systems that could help clinicians improve the care of elderly and disabled patients.

    Even so, the Chan Zuckerberg plan is marked by its ambition.


    Analysis by James Gallagher, health and science reporter, BBC News

    This is certainly an ambitious project, but is $3bn (£2.3bn) over the next decade enough to fulfil it?

    One British charity - Cancer Research UK - is likely to spend more in that time on just one disease. Its research budget is currently $0.5bn (£404m) a year.

    The Wellcome Trust - the world's biggest medical research charity - is investing significantly more: $6.5bn (£5bn) over the next five years.

    And the US' medical research agency, the National Institutes of Health, spends a whopping $32.3bn (£25bn) every year.

    There is no doubt that the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative could make a real impact - the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation has given real impetus to eliminating malaria.

    And advances in technology are transforming and accelerating medical research - for example, cancer drugs designed by artificial intelligence are showing success in clinical trials.

    But curing, preventing or managing all disease remains a lofty and distant goal.


    Biohub projects

    Mr Zuckerberg said that at present 50 times more money was spent on treating people who are sick than on curing the diseases that would stop them getting ill in the first place, and added that this needed to change.

    Source: BBC

    Read more »
Like us on Facebook and get connected.


advertisements

Categories





advertisements
RSS
advertisements